- Home
- Insights & Immigration News Alerts
- Insights
- Understanding Good-Faith Recruitment in the PERM Process: Lessons from Recent Enforcement Actions
GUIDE | Updated September 2026
Understanding Good-Faith Recruitment in the PERM Process: Lessons from Recent Enforcement Actions
As enforcement scrutiny increases, employers must demonstrate more than procedural compliance. Learn how the PERM Recruitment Framework supports good-faith labor market testing.
Contents
- Understanding the PERM Recruitment Framework
- What Is Good-Faith Recruitment?
- PERM Recruitment Steps and Advertising Requirements
- Why Good-Faith Recruitment Has Become a Compliance Focus
- What Recent Settlements Suggest About “Good Faith” Recruitment
- Best Practices for PERM Good-Faith Recruitment
- How Envoy Global Can Help
Contents
-
Understanding the PERM Recruitment Framework
-
What Is Good-Faith Recruitment?
-
PERM Recruitment Steps and Advertising Requirements
-
Why Good-Faith Recruitment Has Become a Compliance Focus
-
What Recent Settlements Suggest About “Good Faith” Recruitment
-
Best Practices for PERM Good-Faith Recruitment
-
How Envoy Global Can Help
Understanding the PERM Recruitment Framework
Recent enforcement actions and legal developments have put PERM recruitment compliance back in the spotlight.
For employers sponsoring foreign national talent, the key question is no longer simply whether recruitment requirements were met, but whether the recruitment process can withstand scrutiny as a genuine, good-faith effort to test the U.S. labor market.
While the PERM framework has not fundamentally changed, recent actions by the Department of Labor (DOL) and Department of Justice (DOJ) offer important clues about how regulators may assess recruitment practices and identify potential compliance concerns.
What Is Good-Faith Recruitment?
The PERM labor certification process is designed to test the U.S. labor market before an employer sponsors a foreign worker for permanent residence. As part of that process, employers must recruit in good faith and provide U.S. workers with a meaningful opportunity to learn about and apply for available positions before pursuing permanent labor certification for a foreign national worker.
At its core, good-faith recruitment requires employers to conduct recruitment in a manner that genuinely tests the labor market rather than simply fulfilling a procedural obligation.
Managing Attorney
PERM Recruitment Steps and Advertising Requirements
Understanding the requirements of good-faith recruitment begins with understanding the PERM recruitment framework itself.
During the PERM process, employers generally must:
- Notify current employees by posting an Internal Posting Notice at the worksite for at least 10 consecutive business days. The notice must be posted physically and, where applicable, electronically.
- Advertise the role with the State Workforce Agency (SWA)
- For professional occupations requiring at least a bachelor’s degree, place two Sunday newspaper advertisements in the area of intended employment.
- Complete three additional recruitment steps selected from an approved list of recruitment methods. Examples of additional PERM recruitment advertising methods include:
- Employer website postings
- Job fairs
- Employee referral programs
- Professional or trade organizations
- Third-party job search websites
- On-campus recruiting
- Campus placement offices
- Private employment firms
- Local or ethnic newspapers
- Radio and television advertisements
While these recruitment requirements have existed for many years, recent enforcement activity has highlighted the importance of consistent recruitment practices, thorough documentation and effective recordkeeping.
Looking for a deeper understanding of PERM and the green card process?
Our guide, Permanent Residency: A Strategic Guide to U.S. Green Cards, breaks down the employment-based permanent residence journey, including PERM requirements, sponsorship strategies and compliance considerations for employers.
Why Good-Faith Recruitment Has Become a Compliance Focus
Several recent government actions have centered on allegations that U.S. worker applicants were required to apply through processes that differed from those used for non-PERM positions.
According to allegations described in settlement agreements and litigation filings, some employers were accused of creating obstacles that made it more difficult for U.S. workers to apply for PERM-sponsored roles. Examples cited by regulators included application methods that relied on paper submissions or email addresses that allegedly did not exist or were not actively monitored.
Regardless of the outcome of any individual case, they provide a useful window into how government agencies are interpreting and enforcing good-faith recruitment standards.
What Recent Settlements Suggest About “Good Faith” Recruitment
Although settlement agreements do not create new laws or regulations, they can provide insight into current enforcement priorities and agency expectations.
Measures included in recent settlement agreements have included:
- Posting PERM opportunities on public-facing careers websites
- Allowing candidates to submit resumes and cover letters electronically
- Maintaining and actively monitoring recruitment email inboxes
- Providing training on discriminatory hiring practices
- Enhancing recruitment documentation and recordkeeping practices
- Providing periodic reports, records and compliance-related information to government agencies
Taken together, these developments reflect a heightened enforcement focus on PERM recruitment compliance, with agencies increasingly examining both adherence to regulatory requirements and the transparency and accessibility of the recruitment process.
While these actions do not create new legal requirements, they offer insight into how existing regulations may be interpreted and enforced.
Best Practices for PERM Good-Faith Recruitment
One lesson emerging from recent enforcement activity is that consistency matters.
Employers should evaluate whether PERM recruitment is administered in a manner that aligns with broader recruiting practices. Areas worth reviewing include:
- Application methods and accessibility
- Recruitment advertising channels
- Email monitoring and response procedures
- Candidate review timelines
- Documentation and retention policies
- Recruiter and hiring manager training
Timely review of applications, consistent recruitment procedures and thorough documentation can help employers demonstrate compliance and support a strong record of good-faith recruitment if recruitment efforts later come under regulatory scrutiny.
The Compliance Challenge: Accessibility vs. Administrative Burden
“Recent PERM settlements have brought increased attention to how employers make sponsored positions accessible to U.S. workers. In response, some organizations have chosen to post PERM opportunities on their public-facing Careers pages as part of broader compliance and risk-management efforts.
While greater visibility can help demonstrate openness to U.S. worker applicants, it can also create practical challenges. Job openings posted on the company’s Careers pages are frequently redistributed by third-party job platforms, which can significantly increase application volume.
As application volumes grow, employers may experience:
- Increased candidate review requirements
- Additional documentation and recordkeeping obligations
- Greater pressure on recruiting teams to review applications promptly
- Broader applicant pools that may influence recruitment timelines and workforce planning decisions
The key consideration for employers is balancing accessibility and transparency with the operational resources required to support a consistent, well-documented recruitment process. As enforcement expectations continue to evolve, organizations should regularly evaluate their recruitment practices to ensure they remain transparent, well-documented and aligned with both compliance objectives and business needs.”
How Envoy Global Can Help
While there is no one-size-fits-all approach to PERM compliance, ongoing evaluation of recruitment practices can help organizations maintain compliance, reduce risk and adapt to evolving enforcement expectations while supporting broader talent mobility and workforce goals.
Experienced immigration counsel can provide strategic guidance as organizations navigate these evolving requirements. Support may include:
- Evaluating recruitment practices in light of current enforcement trends
- Strengthening good-faith recruitment and documentation strategies
- Reviewing candidate screening, recordkeeping and compliance procedures
- Aligning compliance efforts with broader business objectives
- Monitoring ongoing legal and regulatory developments
As scrutiny of PERM recruitment practices continues to increase, employers must be prepared to demonstrate that their efforts represent a genuine test of the U.S. labor market. Envoy Global combines experienced immigration counsel and purpose-built technology to help organizations navigate complex immigration processes with confidence and greater visibility.
Contact Envoy Global to learn how our team can help strengthen your PERM program while supporting your organization’s long-term workforce and global mobility objectives.
Contributor
Frank Fogelbach
Managing Attorney
Frank has over 14 years of experience providing counsel to small, medium, large and Fortune 100 companies on all aspects of their immigration programs. He has extensive experience with all nonimmigrant matters, PERM labor certification, immigrant visa petitions, RFE responses and AAO appeals. Frank is known for his high-touch service and careful handling of high-visibility matters. His clients have been employers in a wide range of industries, including high technology, healthcare, financial services, research institutions and universities, automotive, professional sports teams and art galleries, to name a few. Frank helps companies create and enhance large-scale immigration protocols and procedures while working closely with internal global mobility teams. As a supervising attorney at CIP, he serves as a leader and mentor to other immigration professionals. Frank is licensed to practice law in California and New York.